Hills of Hayward







christine and harrison’s home

Article in Mercury on Taiwanese Election

Filed under: 2008 Elections — harrison at 9:08 am on Thursday, March 20, 2008

Please email jboudreau@mercurynews.com if this article annoys you - Taiwanese in Bay Area return to island for closely fought presidential election

——————

Dear Mr. Boudreau,

I was excited to see that SJ Mercury covering the Taiwanese elections in a couple of articles this morning. I was raised in the US from a Taiwanese immigrant family, and only recently have tried to understand the Taiwanese political situation, but even to me, your description of the candidate positions underneath the candidate photos are politically biased

Under Ma Ying-Jeau, the positional description you wrote was:

“Wants closer ties with China in hopes of economic growth and possible reunification.”

Reunification with China is definitely NOT one of his position statements. The official endorsement of Chinese reunification with the Taiwanese citizenship is akin to political suicide; by printing this, you are misrepresenting his position and aiding the DPP rhetoric against him.

Under Frank Hsieh, the positional description you wrote was:

“Wants closer ties with China but sees a danger in becoming too economically dependant on the mainland.”

Although this may be his public statement, the DPP positions on restricting chinese imports, limiting business investments by Taiwanese in the Chinese marketplace, even the issue of allowing Chinese students to attend Taiwanese universities, their actions are consistently highly protectionist and cannot be reconciled with the statement “wants closer ties with China”.

I feel that you should either be consistent in writing the official party statement, however misleading, for both candidates, or write the worst arguments against each candidate. The issue is consistency.

Regards,

Harrison Hung

6 Comments »

Comment by Peter

March 20, 2008 @ 10:25 am

Good post.

Comment by Duc

March 20, 2008 @ 4:45 pm

I want to visit Taiwan someday

Comment by carage

March 20, 2008 @ 5:18 pm

Um…actually that has something to do with what Ma said back in 2005 in an interview with some English news magazine, since then he has tried to “revise” his statement.
The question occured again in 2006 when he was on BBC Hard Talk. Whether or not he actually answered the question is up to interpretation.
Political suicide or not, technically “ultimate reunification” is still official KMT core policy.
Just like “TW independence” is DPP’s core official policy, although DPP candidates occasionally distance themselves from that core policy to maximize voter support.

Comment by harrison

March 20, 2008 @ 5:21 pm

The point here is consistency when representing the positions of the candidates. Any piece of journalism should strive to remove bias from its reporting. This may be too much to ask in the highly-partisan newsrooms of Taiwan, but it should still called out in US newspapers.

Comment by carage

March 21, 2008 @ 5:20 am

I agree with you completely, but how can we expect the media to be consistent while the politians cannot stay consistent themselves?
Both candidates and their parties have serious issues regarding consistency and honesty.
OK, DPP probably isn’t the champion of democracy they claimed to be, but it is also hard to believe that the beuracrats under the former dictatorship has a sudden change of heart either.
Ma has the problem, just a little more than ten years ago he still publicly opposed direct elections for president, now he is on the ballot himself.
Hsieh always appear as if he is some freedom fighter or champion of democracy, then it turns out he was an informant of the secret police all along.
Ironic, isn’t it?
Of course they can always argue that we have to look at the circumstances, but what is going to happen when the circumstances change again?
Just like the relation with China.
I thought KMT was supposed to be the sworn enemy of the CCP, and people like grandpa would probably agree.
Then Lien and Soong made it look like KMT and CCP are best of buddies.
DPP is not a friend of China either, so I expect their China policy to hit a rock even if they do win the election some how.
Perhaps we just need to wait for different circumstances, like TW gets a Gundam or some super weapon that could end the nuclear threat, or I just watch too much anime.

Comment by harrison

March 27, 2008 @ 9:58 am

The journalist at the SJ Mercury News, John Boudreau, writes back to tell me that his source for the information about Ma Ying Jeau considering Chinese reunification to be one of Ma’s advisors.

This is contradicted in an article in the NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/22/world/asia/22cnd-taiwan.html?em&ex=1206417600&en=d0f6e91946c1b1cb&ei=5087%0A

“During the campaign, he ruled out any discussion of political reunification while calling for the introduction of direct, regularly scheduled flights to Shanghai and Beijing and an end to Taiwan’s extensive limits on its companies’ ability to invest on the mainland.”

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/9B3B4E8E-C129-4EF2-822D-16BC5585CC93.htm

“Ma said that while he favoured friendlier ties with China, he would not discuss reunification in any of his meetings with Beijing’s leaders.”

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>